Tank Girl (1995)
150 best Science Fiction Movies (Rolling
Stone list)
# 150. Tank Girl (1995)
“Here is a movie that
dives into the bag of filmmaking tricks and chooses all of them. Trying to
re-create the multimedia effect of the comic books it's based on, the film
employs live action, animation, montages of still graphics, animatronic makeup,
prosthetics, song-and-dance routines, models, fake backdrops, holography, title
cards, matte drawings and computerized special effects. All … [it] really
missed were 3-D and Smell-O-Vision.”
n
Critic Roger Ebert (regarding
this film)
“The average
mainstream movie, a hundred thousand people will see it one time, with a cult
movie one person will see in a hundred thousand times.”
n Actor Bruce Campell (who is not in
this film)
Cult films are traditionally
box-office failures though some hits do qualify, like Director Stanely
Kubrick’s “A Clockwork Orange” (1971), which “Tank Girl” tries to emulate. Their
initial failure is often justly deserved as they are often quite bad on the
whole, but they have a specialness shining through; they did one thing right,
something very new and very different, allowing them to rise again after being beaten
down by financial failure, Critical contempt, and/or its own-hard-to-ignore
incompetence. That Secret Sauce that allows something as sordidly valueless
like “Manos: The Hand of Fate” (1966) to still have an audience today because,
as Critic Bobby Thompson wrote,
"It's like a train wreck; you just can't take your eyes off it."
I doubt many of my readers have even heard of that the same year’s top-grossing
film, “Hawaii.”
“Tank Girl” initially
bombed, but even then, its eventual Cult status was almost assured. Though a Hot
Mess of a film, it didn’t only one, but a number of things, wonderfully right,
and one of those things was more important than all the rest. These days, the key
to appreciating all it accomplished and forgiving all its failures is pretty
simple:
How much do
you love lead Actress Lori Petty?
I do, and it
seems I loved her more than most did back in 1995, but even then, almost everyone
loved her at least a little bit. Even among the legions of Critics who
condemned this film, most made a least a little room in their hearts to praise
her.
It’s based on the English Comic Book
Character “Tank Girl” (first appearing in 1988, originally Written by Alan Martin and drawn by Jamie Hewlett).
Set in a Post-Apocalyptic Australia and detailing the adventures of the Title Character,
more properly named Rebecca Buck, an exceptionally cheerful embodiment of Antisocial
Personality Disorder, who drives around the Wasteland in a Military Tank that
doubles as her home. She’s described by Critic Deborah Cartmell as "unheroic or even
accidental antihero," largely lacking in the Seven Cardinal
Virtues her because she’s initially a Bounty Hunter/Mercenary working for
a Secret Government Organization. She pissed off her Paymasters and became an
Outlaw to all, but not because of some act of Noble Rebellion, but because she
was too often a Cowardly, Drug-Addled, Screw-up, Transgressive in her Sexuality
and (the final straw) failed to deliver a colostomy bag to the President in a
timely fashion.
The film ditches most of that, but retains much of the
Character’s core, or as the film’s Director, Rachel Talalay, said, “The person who would say the worst possible
thing that could come out of her mouth in the worst possible situation to mess
everything up.”
The
comic was aggressively Punk in style, plotted with deliberate mis-care, celebrating
its own disorganization, indulging in Literary Absurdism, Surrealism, and
cheeky Nihilism. The picture panels seemed to beg for screen adaptation but the
strong influence of Novelist William S. Burroughs’ Anarchistic Writing techniques
made such an adaptation near-impossible. Other challenges to the film included that
an acceptable running time was only about 1 ½ hours while it was trying
to summarize a story (or story-ish-thing) that had been continuously progressing
for more than a half-decade. Further, it’s not-low-but-not-huge budget of $25
million required Talalay to reach out for major studio backing (that’s another
thing, Cult Films are generally Independently Produced) and she lacked the
complete Creative Control over the project that Kubrick enjoyed over everything he did after 1960.
True, Talalay also lacked Kubrick’s beautiful focus and
commanding hand, but still it seems that it was studio interference was really the last
nail in this film’s coffin. In later interviews, Talalay takes blame for much
of what went wrong, but also unleashes Tank-Girl-ish fury at all those who
meddled in her Dream Project.
We learn in the opening
narration (by Actress Petty) that the End of the World as We Know It was 2022
because of a Meteor Impact, and we’re now looking at 2033, with
the Earth and turned it into one big desert. “The World is screwed… no celebrities, no cable TV, no water.” In the film version,
the comic book’s terrible Governments are a thing of the past and the real
power rests with the Evil Water and Power Corporation (WP). Meanwhile our Heroine,
Rebecca-not-yet-transformed-into-Tank-Girl (Petty), has a great life living outside the system in a community full
of similar Anti-Establishment types who steal water from WP for their
hydroponic garden full of healthy vegetables. Then her community is attacked by
WP, her boyfriend, Richard (Brian Wimmer), is murdered, and
Rebecca and several others are Enslaved.
Our main Villian, WP Overlord Kesslee (Malcom McDowell), is not in the comic
book. He sees special potential in his captive Rebecca and forces her to be his
Mercenary in his War against his arch-Enemies, the Rippers. Even before her
first Mission starts, Rebecca escapes, stealing a Tank and leading another
Slave, Jet Girl (Naomi Watts), into Rebellion with her. Embracing the
philosophy of putting her bad attitude to good use, she runs straight to the
arms of the Rippers with not-yet-fully-formed ideas about Liberating All
Mankind and saving a little girl captured during the raid on her Commune, Sam
(Stacey Lin Ramsower).
Though driven by a Revenge Motive, Rebecca-now-Tank-Girl
never loses her joy in life. She postures as an Outlaw, but in the manner of Robin
Hood mode, that ancient hero of 15th c. ballads, not the embodiment
of the comic book’s 20th c. cynicism. She stands up for Victims of Sexual, Race, and Species Discriminations. This kind of watering-down stalks much of SF
cinema (really, all cinema), an idea-driven Genre that’s audiences generally expect
to dumb-itself-down, and whose envelope-expanding ambitions are always
competing with those conventional elements included to make new-looking things
easier to digest. One Critic noted, “If there’s a philosophy here,
then Bart Simpson is Plato.”
Gone are Tank Girl’s selfishness and drug use (I didn’t
even see marijuana in the hydroponic garden), and mostly sacrificed is the
anti-Corporate Satire (the Villains are a Corporation, but that seems more
obligatory than a statement), further it oddly treats her Bisexuality as more
taboo that her penchant for Inter-Species Sex. Talalay must be responsible for much
of this, she supervised Tedi Sarafian’s script (this was
Sarafain’s first produced Script, everything that followed was SF,F&H or
simply unrealistic, and none of it was very good), but it seems that to find
the real villains we must pull the curtain back on Talalay’s own Corporate
Masters.
Retaining a Transgressive
posture while doing away with Transgressive or Controversial content is not a
new thing; the Crime Film “Crossfire” (1947) was pretty bold, one of the first
two Mainstream Hollywood movies to take on USA Jew-Hatred (the other was
“Gentlemen’s Agreement” of the same year) but, in fact, the novel it’s based
on, “The Brick Foxhole” (1945) by Richard
Brooks, wasn’t about Jew-Hatred but something even more Taboo, the Victim was
murdered because he was Gay. To pull off such Watering-Down well, the
decisions must be made by people with Creative Investment in the project, for
example, the great Producer Walt Disney sanitized the often wildly
Child-Inappropriate content of Fairy Tales and creating timeless Children’s Classics.
Here, Talalay had that
investment, and it shows, but the people above her were unenthused. More than a
decade later Talalay joked (Please note: All quotes
from Talalay that follow are compressed and reordered from four interviews), “Now you look at the
movie and go ‘How can this be ‘R’-rated?’ But at that point – and it wasn’t
that long ago – they made me cut so much out of it because they were so
frightened of it. If we’d made it three years later [1999], when the “South
Park” movie came out … it would have been ‘make the much hipper
version that you want to make, and push the envelope further.’ They were scared
of their own shadows.”
Talalay
was 32-years-old when this film was made, so within the age-range of the film’s
target audience, but a bit old to have ever been exposed to the comic,
especially because she’s from USA where “Tank Girl” was relatively unknown (though
I’ve read it inspired USA Singer Gwen Stefani’s look and it was a monster hit
in England, beloved by that Country’s Fashion Designers). Still, Talalay was of
a tender-age to already have such a longish resume: She after graduating from
Yale with a Mathematics degree she switched to a film career at 24-years-old,
working as Production Assistant and/or
Manager on low-budget Cult-Classics like Director John Waters’ “Polyester”
(1981), made for less-than $300,000, and “Android” (1982), made for less-than
$1 million and thrown together in a crazed rush to take advantage of the sets
built for another movie that’s production was suddenly canceled. There she
learned the all-important skill of organizing complex productions while keeping
their costs down. In
1988, she’d graduated to Producer with “A Nightmare on Elm Street 4: the Dream
Master,” the film which demonstrated that ennui
had caught up with the popular franchise, and another Waters’, “Hairspray.” (Most of the
best films she was involved in were in association with Waters and his
aesthetic permeates “Tank Girl.”) She finally graduated to Director with the
very worst “A Nightmare on Elm Street” film, “The Final Freddy: Freddy's Dead”
(1991) and the equally awful “The Ghost in the Machine” (1993).
Talay
was introduced to the comic by her stepdaughter while working on “The Final
Freddy....” She instantly fell in love and secured the rights. In retrospect
it’s clear her successes while working in other job-titles than Director kept
her still viable in her industry but it was really her control of this
property, which had so much potential, that secured this her the plumb
Directing gig, not any talent previously on display.
She proceeded pitching
the project and was repeatedly turned down, “The first place I went was to Jim Cameron’s company [Lightstorm], and the
executive there said to me ‘But we already have a movie with a female lead.’”
At Dreamworks, “They said ‘We really appreciate you thinking that we’re hip
enough to do this, but we’re not’. Jamie Hewlett just loved the idea that we
were too hip for Spielberg.” She actually did get
an offer from Disney, but her experience with
“The Final Freddy…” and New Line Cinema already taught her about how studio
interference making her job harder (she "would occasionally get internal memos telling me,
'Don't be too girly; don't be too sensitive.'"), and figured that the amount of violence and sex the film
required would make a working relationship with Mickey Mouse impossible. She
accepted the offer from United Artists (UA) because she expected better
treatment.
She was wrong.
When she sold it to UA, Alan Ladd Jr. was in charge. During Development
he was replaced by John Calley. “I don’t know what you do when you’re heavily
into development and getting a film made, and you realise that your executive
is the wrong person for it. You have to be awfully strong. I didn’t really know
that it would go wrong until we got into post-production.”
Talalay worked closely with “Tank Girl’s” co-Creators
Martin and Hewlett during the production, and they with Production Designer
Catherine Hardwicke. She had to fight UA about almost everything, even hiring
the then-unknown Hardwicke (now a prominent Director) and Talalay winning that this
battle was among the film’s triumphs. Hardwicke successfully captured the look
of the original product, cluttering every frame with Pop Culture allusions. Hardwicke’s
task was not enviable as Hewlett’s marvelously drawn panels were inserted
into the film at strategic moments (given motion by Animator Mike Smith and the flawless quick-cutting
of Editor James Symons) which created a direct competition between the
medium-budget live-action and the legendary pen.
This
was the period after Tim Burton’s “Batman” (1989) but before “X—Men” (2000) when Comic-Book Movies were Big-Money, but studios
had no idea how to approach them. They recognized that the old approach, the High
Camp of the older “Batman” TV series (first aired 1966) wasn’t going to work, and
there was interest in reaching across the pond to English comic series, cheaper
to secure, proven popular, and differently conceived than the USA model, but …
well … though “differently conceived” made them attractive to one level of Executives,
but terrifying to the next level up. In the costly productions that followed there
was a shocking indifference to serving the pre-existing Fan-Base, probably born
of a fear of appealing only to a Niche audience. 1995 saw the release of another
film based on another English comic book Character, “Judge Dredd,” which also bombed (even worse than
this film) largely because it didn’t emulate that which it tried to adapt (that
didn’t happen here).
During the Hellish
post-production the studio insisting on almost entirely cutting out a major Character,
Sub Girl (Ann Cusack). “So, who didn’t like Sub Girl? I don’t know. It could
have been somebody’s mother, as far as I know, because they kept me from
all the internal discussions. They just said ‘This is what you’re doing.’
“And it would be like
someone going ‘I’m offended that there are dildos in her bedroom’, so that
whole scene has to be cut out. Oh my God, dildos! So that was how irrational it
all was.
“So, I remember calling
my lawyer and telling him this, and he said ‘There’s nothing rational going on,
Rachel’. And he was just brilliant, because he said ‘Nothing makes sense.’”
The studio even cut the rain storm from the original ending,
something anticipated by almost every previous image and as a result the
following animation made little sense.
Talalay was most pissed
off about the Musical Number, a Busby Berkley-influenced dance routine to a
cover of Cole Porter’s, "Let's Do It"
while Tank-Girl was robbing a posh Brothel (called “Liquid Silver,” likely a
reference to the earlier Punk/Cult/SF film, “Liquid Sky” (1982)):
“They chopped it to
shreds. Finally, the music supervisor [Dick Bernstein] went in and said ‘You
cannot put this out like this’. They took half the stanzas out, so that it
didn’t even cut, and she asked them to at least give her the length that they
wanted and to let her cut it so that it wasn’t a travesty. We went in and
re-did it so that we got it the length that they wanted it, so it wasn’t so
musically hideous. It’s still missing one of my favourite stanzas…
“There were scenes where
we’d do a test-screening and a scene would be the most popular. One would be on
the list of most popular scenes, and then they would recut it, take all the
good stuff out of it and it would stop being on the list of most-popular scenes.
“So, I would go and say
‘Here are your statistics – on this cut, twenty percent of people listed this
as their favourite scene’…which is huge ... ‘So therefore, can we put the cut
back the way it was? Because you’ve taken out what people liked about it.’. And
they would go ‘No.’
“Normally you’ve got the
director fighting the statistics and going ‘No, no, no, but I love that scene
and it has to stay on’ and the studio going ‘but here we tested it!’. And here
I was doing the opposite, saying ‘Look, we tested it and now you’ve emasculated
the scene.’ And people don’t care. And they’re going ‘Well tough, it’s just
what we think’ …
“There were numerous
times in post-production when I called my lawyer and said ‘I want to leave the
show’, and he said ‘No, you have to stay and fight, or nobody will
fight for it.’”
Talalay claims that
after exhausting battles she got about 20% of the cuts restored. “But I
occasionally read things like ‘Why didn’t Rachel just stand-up and..’ blah blah
blah, and I think ‘Boy, you have no idea. I’m happy that you can think that and
hate me, but you have no idea what it was like being in the middle of what I
was in the middle of’ … But I don’t resent at all the comic-book fans who feel I
didn’t succeed, because I didn’t succeed.”
And even more insults
were to come, “When they put the VHS out, I was very upset – we shot in
widescreen, in Cinemascope, and when they put the VHS out they didn’t even
bother to letterbox it. VHS is 4:3, which means forty percent of the frame is
missing.”
But
still, there was Actress Petty.
She
was the spitting image of the Heroine, Critic
Owen Gleibermann describes, “Visually, she’s all lithe, seductive angles: long
limbs and stretchy torso, a platinum-blond fringed buzz cut that brings out the
razory thrust of her lips and cheeks.” The website Movie Scene added, “Petty who delivers one of the most striking
and random characters who I have come across who despite being rough is also
sexy and at times surprisingly cute.” Petty
now seems the only conceivable choice for
the role, but, in fact, she wasn’t.
Apparently
to prove the English-cred of a product coming from a USA Director and studio,
and mostly filmed in Arizona, there was an Open Casting Event in London; though
only a publicity stunt, its became famous because three of the girls who met on
the line really hit-it-off and decided to start the band called “Spice Girls.” Lalalay
had already cast an English-expatriate now based in New York, Actress Emily
Loyd, for the lead. Well into rehearsals Talalay had to fire Loyd for a
combination of being difficult because of her worsening Mental Illness and resisting
an already agreed upon haircut. (Lalay avoiding a complaint leveled against the
“Judge Dredd” movie, wherein Actor Sylvester Stallone reneged on his promise to
wear a helmet that half-covered his face, something the comic’s Fans complained
about that endlessly).
Petty, USA-born,
was Loyd’s replacement. Talalay said, "she is crazy in her own life and
[the film] needed somebody like that.”
Petty is exuberant, tossing out
near-pornographic single-entendres with great aplomb. Critic Almar
Haflidason, who hated the film, aptly summarized her character, “Every retort from her
lip-glossed trash mouth is a sexual come on.” Her voice was somehow girlish
and smokey at the same time and (Gleiberman again), “Petty uses that mock-innocent squeak to
toss out insults like so many spitballs.”
When Rebecca first finds her Tank she
says “I’m in love,” and immediately she straddles the
cannon and slides down its length suggestively to the tune of Issac Hayes’
“Theme from ‘Shaft’” (1971). She’ll do this again while when intimidating a male foe, "Feeling a
little inadequate?" Elsewhere, she speaks
her appreciation of different gun, "My God, the sheer size of it!" In
a scene cut from the movie, she slips a condom over a
banana before throwing it at a Soldier. (This Feminist film is obsessed phallic imagery.) Elsewhere,
bound in a straight-jacket, she complains, "It's really hard for me to
play with myself in this thing!"
She does love her
tank, spouting other affections towards it like “To the Bat-tank!” but she
shows little respect for anyone else, like telling a savaged corpse, "Ugh,
you are SO dead." And her way of saying farewell is, "It's been
swell, but the swelling's gone down." She
kicks and punches men’s balls repeatedly, burps loudly and enthusiastically, and cooks BBQ while in
the middle of a car chase.
She wears about twenty different
costumes and haircuts, all loud, colorful, and chic-sloppy. This film is
haunted by are egregious continuity problems, most likely the product of
post-production butchery, but some clearly deliberate, like Tank Girl changing
clothes and hair cut from scene-to-scene when the was no logical opportunity to
do so in-between. Costume Designers Arianne Phillips and Tony Gardner (the
latter uncredited) seemed to be having as much as Petty. There’s an especially
telling scene when Tank Girl is rudely dismissive of the Fashion Advice provided
by an AI at the Brothel as she assembles for herself the outfit she wore during
the Musical Number.
Petty wasn’t the only worthy performance.
Actor McDowell was much praised. Kesslee was the kind of Megalomanic had become
McDowell’s bread-and-butter while averaging about five films or TV episodes a
year, all supporting parts, collecting a paycheck while not really having to do
much work. Here though, he’s convincing as his Character in ways he hadn’t been
since “Chains of Desire” (1992). He played Kesslee as a grown-up version of his
Star-Making Character Alex DeLarge from “A Clockwork Orange” bringing in the
same Boyishness though no longer young, and the same bright-eyed Pleasure in Cruelty.
Better-still, he and Petty shared more chemistry than Rebecca had with her
boyfriend in the opening scenes. His character also came with some neat visual
tricks too, Cyborg arm, a Holographic head, and a weapon the drains and
purifies its victims water content, filling a conveniently attached plastic
drinking bottle.
McDowell praised Costumer
Phillips for giving him a way into Kesslee. Phillps wrote, “He came to the fitting and he was
really appreciative. He said 'I haven't had time to do my research ... this has
really helped me tremendously to figure out my character and have an angle on
my character.'” She put him in black suit with a white waistcoat and white
shirt with no tie. He responded, “‘Yes, I know who I am now!’”
McDowell offered similar
praise to both Director Lalalay and Actress Petty, saying “Tank Girl” had the "same
flavour" as “A Clockwork Orange.”
The then-unknown Actress Watts’
part as the shy and bespectacled Jet Girl was small and reportedly Watts is ashamed
of the movie now, which is a shame. Hers was the only Naturalistic Performance
in the array of unabashedly Cartoon Characters and she shines in her mostly throw-away
scenes.
Rapper/Actor Ice Tea was T-Saint,
a member of the Tribe of Kesslee’s adversaries, the Rippers. They’re described
in the opening narration as, “A demonic army of blood-thirsty, human-eating, purse-snatching,
mutant creatures,” and though Ice Tea is almost unrecognizable under his
make-up and prosthetics he, as usual, has pissed-off attitude to burn.
The Rippers were Mutant Kangaroos infused with Reincarnated
Human personalities and born of some bizarre experiments financed by the WP but
then they Rebelled. As for their Monstrousness … well… Yes, they proved to be Murderous
efficient Guerilla Fighters, but when Tank Girl joins their band, they prove to
share more with the Commune Tank Girl was Kidnapped from than the Tyrants and
Thugs of WP. They have a great love of dancing, drums, and Beat Poetry. It’s no
surprise Tank Girl enters into a Romance with one, but not the expected T-Saint,
reincarnated from a tough Cop, but sweet natured and dim-witted Booga (Jeff Kober), reincarnated from a loyal dog (in
the comic he’s a reincarnated Toy Designer, in case you’re wondering how a dog
learned to speak English), this reflects Tank Girls attitude towards
male-female Power Relationships.
The Creatures were designed
by FX-Makeup legend Stan Winston whom Lalalay didn’t think she could afford,
but he cut his price because he loved the challenge. He stated Ripper’s would
be, "the best characters we've had the opportunity
to do." The Rippers featured no puppets or CGI
because Lalalay wanted fuller performances from her Rippers than one would
encounter with the Pin-Up Girl/Monster of “Species” released the same year. The
Mutants had articulated ears and tails, activated by remote
control, and mechanical snouts, responding to the movement of the Actors'
mouths plus remote control, each Ripper required three technicians in addition
to the Actor. The result was Light-Years ahead of cinema’s
closest comparison, “Matilda” (1978), though the level of technology applied in
both films was largely the same.
“Stan … did a full naked
version of Booga [at a cost of $5,000]… I mean full anatomical. We shot some
outtakes of this completely naked creation, and I would love to go back and get
that footage, because that would be enough to sell it ... Well that,
I knew, we weren’t getting away with, but since Stan built it, I was going to
shoot it.”
There was an unexplicit Love-Scene between Rebecca
and Booga, but sensing UA would balk at a depiction of Bestiality, the Romance was
deliberately left out of the first draft of the script. Only in “the second or
third” versions, with the Booga Character already established in the minds of the
Producers, was it slipped in because by then Booga, "was a character and
not just a kangaroo [so] it wasn't an issue anymore."
Even in the accepted version of the Love Scene, the
most famous piece of costuming was cruelly down-played. In the comic, Tank Girl
had a bra that looked like two ICBMs. The bra made it into the movie, but the
only permitted shot was head-on, so the missiles no longer looked like missiles
(that somehow managed to be in the animations).
Ice-T’s music was featured in
the film, as well as Devo (memorably used in opening credits), L7, Veruca Salt,
Björk, Portishead, Bush, Joan
Jett, and Paul Westerberg. Talalay
hired the famous (notorious?) Rocker Courtney Love as her Executive Music Coordinator and extra-long song-samples proved a more
significant contribution than Graem Revell’s score. Love was originally supposed
to be Jet Girl, but demurred from such a large commitment after the suicide of
her husband, Rocker Kurt Cobain.
But even for all of this, appreciated
as it was, I still have to agree with most of the bad things people said about
the film at the time. I opened this essay with promising words from Critic
Ebert, unfortunately he closed his own review with this scolding observation, “Director Sidney Lumet has a new book out about how to
make movies. In it he observes that slowly-paced scenes can actually make a
movie seem to go faster than a relentless pacing that never stops.”
Leonard Klady, “What’s missing from the mix is an engaging story
to bind together its intriguing bits ...
a classic case of kitchen-sink
filmmaking, in which the principals have thrown everything into the stew,
hoping enough will stick to the audience.”
A Critic whose name I have now lost, “A true punk heroine
would have been a pleasure, with excessive violence, nudity, and something to
shock society. Instead, the worst thing your grandma might say about Tank
Girl is that she really should use less foul language.”
And
the above-mentioned Gleiberman admired many things in the film, but ultimately
concluded the it clearly would “rather be cute than dangerous.”
Though the Hot-Mess and Studio Interference problems
are easy enough to explain, it still mystifies that a film as insanely timely
as “Tank Girl” didn’t click despite its flaws. It was the first Riot Grrrl
movie, a Sub-Culture of the Punk Sub-Culture that was almost certainly inspired
by the comic. Riot Grrrl was born in the USA in 1991 when a group of women from
Washington State and Washington DC (so, 2,798 miles apart), held a meeting
about sexism in the various local Punk scenes across the United States. They were
Sex-Positive, Third-Wave Feminists, younger and louder than the Gloria Steinem
breed, and, importantly, initially all Musical Artists, fighting for a place
where they could, as women, express emotions like Cheerful Rage and indulge in
Gross-Out Humor that were generally only acceptable for male Songwriters. Critic Megan
Carpenter, “The movie delighted a generation of women who wanted to see the
ways they saw the world arrayed against them reflected onscreen — and who also
wanted to wear combat boots with fishnets.”
It was also released only three-and-a-half years after the
Scandal triggered by Anita Hill's allegations against Supreme Court nominee
Clarence Thomas, two years after the “Year of the Woman,” when, in reaction to
the Hill/Thomas scandal a Blue Political Wave raised the number of women
serving in the US Senate from only two up to a defiant six, and less-than-a-year
after Paula Jones' allegations of sexual harassment against President Bill
Clinton became public. Taking that under consideration, the most obvious reason Character
Jet Girl survived the cuts that near-eliminated Sub Girl was a sub-plot
concerning her being Sexually Harassed by, and then taking Revenge on, a WP
Minion named Sergeant Small (Don Harvey and, yes, the Character name is yet
another phallic reference).
Gleiberman again, “It passed the Bechdel Test on women in film
[a test almost accidently created by comic book Writer/Artist Alison Bechdel in 1985 to measure how seriously
a film takes its female Characters] before anybody else in Hollywood was even
taking it [it entered the vocabulary of Film Criticism in the 2010s]— and,
technically, Tank Girl … and Jet Girl … never have a conversation about men
unless it's about killing them.”
Ernest Mathijs
and Jamie Sexton, in their book “Cult Cinema (published 2011), went father, arguing
that “Tank Girl” reached farther than any of other films of its time, or even
after, that were offering strong female leads, including those from other
female Directors. Mathijs and Sexton questioned if the other films were they truly
feminist or that the perception was merely "the effect of the performance
of feminist attitudes in its reception. They accused Director Kathryn Bigelow
(who released “Strange Days” that same year) of being “too masculine” to be
rightly Feminist. Similarly. They scolded this film’s Production Designer,
Hardwicke, after she turned Director, of only catering to
"hetero-normativity” (Hardwicke’s her first film, “Thirteen” (2004) was
about a teen being led astray because she fell in with a bad influence and in
the end running back into the arms of her mother, and her most famous film, “Twilight”
(2008), was a romantic Vampire tale that reflects a Mormon world-view). The
authors considered only “Tank Girl” to be a "'real' feminist
cult film."
But, referring back to
Lalalay’s above-reference to “South Park,” I could also argue “insanely timely”
also means “mold-breaking” and therefore also could mean “too soon.” Carpentier
again, “It didn't feel like a movie made for men, and it didn't feel like a
‘chick flick,’ as we were then given to understand those categories; it wasn't
a ‘date movie’ or a ‘kids' movie’ or an ‘art house film.’ It was an action film
— a comic book movie, even, when those were hardly a thing unless they starred
Michael Keaton — and a sci-fi one at that.”
Of
course there’s also another, simpler, explanation: market oversaturation. 1995
offered us a bump-crop of decently-to-hugely budgeted SF films that were remarkably diverse and some were
remarkably good, but most of them bombed. Restraining myself to budgets of $20
million and above, there were few
heathy vegetables came out of Hollywood’s hydroponic gardens and so most deserved their ignominious fate. The bad ones were: “Congo,”
“Johnny Mnemonic,” the above
mentioned “Judge Dredd,” “Village of the Damned,” “Virtuosity,”
and “Waterworld.”
But there were Masterpieces that lost money too: “The City of Lost Children” (a French language
film) and “12 Monkeys.”
So
what chance was there for the ambitious but seriously flawed films like this one
and the above-mentioned “Strange Days”?
Still, if there was a Just God, then how could this film
bomb while complete trash like the above-mentioned “Species” make boat loads of
cash? Maybe because “Species” had more nudity while indulging in, rather than
challenging, conventional misogyny.
Back
to Talalay, “I really thought I’m going to break
the glass ceiling and there’s going to be success for women in action … It was
so devastating to me when it wasn’t … If you look at the statistics now, there’s fifty percent the number of
female directors as there were when I made ‘Tank Girl.’ Now you’re talking
about eight percent versus sixteen percent. What is wrong with this picture? It
hasn’t gotten any better, and I was really hoping that I was going to be the
breakthrough movie.”
Before “Tank Girl” …
well … tanked, it was supposed to make both Talalay and Petty Super Stars. Things
never got very bad for Petty, despite missing out on Super-Stardom she kept
getting plum roles. It was harder for Lalaly as it was her third problematic
film in second-in-a-row financial failure. A lot of bad press came out of that.
The comic’s Creators, though involved in the production, eventually quit in
disgust and bad-mouthed the movie later. According to Hewlett, "The script was lousy; me and Alan
kept rewriting it and putting “Grange Hill” [English TV series first aired 1978] jokes
and ‘Benny Hill’ [English TV series first aired 1969] jokes in, and they
obviously weren't getting it. They forgot to film about ten major scenes so we
had to animate them [note: more likely they were filmed and cut] ... it was a
horrible experience." The film was even blamed for the demise of “Deadline,” the magazine
“Tank Girl” was then-published in.
More than a decade
later, Talalay started to become optimistic. In 2008 she said, “I’ve been
talking to the studio about re-optioning it. I went in and had a conversation
with them, because in order to re-option it, I needed to make sure that they
didn’t want to re-do it themselves ... I don’t want them to say really is ‘Yes,
we do want it’, I want them to say ‘Yes, go ahead and option it and do it in
the way you feel that you weren’t able to do it the first time.’
“There’s nobody there
who was there from the original days, obviously. You’re talking about a
completely different group of people ... Everything has moved on, everything is
different now, and we can talk about it again.”
But later still, the
picture she painted wasn’t so rosey, “Recently I was told ‘There’s somebody
there from the old days that doesn’t like you’. I was told that and I was like
‘Grrrr…ok! Whatever!’. How am I supposed to respond to that? Do I get over it
after thirteen years?
A cloud may have blocked
that ray of sunshine then, but that finally that cloud past as well. In 2014 Shout
Factory bought the film from UA and released it on Blue Ray, improving the
color transfer and finally presenting it in wide-screen format (those elements redeeming
the underappreciated work of Cinematographer Gale
Tattersall). “They went back to the negative. It almost made me cry when
I saw it first on blu-ray. Just the beauty of the transfer. I had never seen it
look that good since the theatre.”
“I get fan mail all the
time. Thank God for the Internet. It is seminal. One of the coolest things
happened recently is my daughter just started university and they did a
screening of it there. One of the woman astronauts took it up to space. That’s
the one she insisted on having with her in outer space. So, I guess you
couldn’t ask for more. Except, you know, I’d love to have more money to make my
next films.”
Better still, Tank Girl had an obvious influence on
how Actress Margo Robbi evolved the Character of Harley Quinn in-between
“Suicide Squad” (2016) and “Birds of Prey: and
the Fantabulous Emancipation of One Harley Quinn”
(2020) so, in 2019, Robbi’s Production company, LuckyChap, bought the rights.
There’s no mention of Talalay in that deal, but she did
return to the Director’s chair before the decade was out, mostly making TV episodes/movies,
but still prestige ones like “Ally McBeal” (between 1999-2002), “Doctor Who” (between
2014-2023), and “Sherlock” (2017) and also receiving Accolades for “The Wind in the Willows” (2006).
“What makes me so proud of the movie is that in spite
of everything that we went through and all the problems and how disappointed I
am on some levels, and how much ahead of the curve I was when I made it, I
still manage to have something that’s lasting. I get fan-mail now just like I
did then … ‘Judge Dredd’ came out at the same time, and it doesn’t
have the same longevity because … at least I hit an audience that I was aiming
to hit.”
Trailer:
PKTV
00074224 000230572 (youtube.com)
Comments
Post a Comment