Pi (as in π, 1998)
Pi (as in π,
1998)
Sol Robeson
(Mark Margolis): “Listen to me. The Ancient Japanese considered the Go board a
microcosm of the universe. When it is empty it appears simple and ordered, but
the possibilities of game play are endless. They say that no two Go games have
ever been alike. Just like snowflakes. So, the Go board actually represents an
extremely complex and chaotic universe. That is the truth of our world, Max. It
can't be easily summed up with math. There is no simple pattern.”
Maximillian "Max" Cohen (Sean Gullette): “But as a Go game progresses,
the possibilities become smaller and smaller. The board does take on order.
Soon, all moves are predictable.”
Sol: “So?”
Max: “So, maybe, even though we're not sophisticated enough to be aware of it,
there is an underlying order... a pattern, beneath every Go game. Maybe that
pattern is like the pattern in the market, in the Torah. The two-sixteen
number.”
This
zero-budget SF film is about Obsession, Paranoia, and how dangerous the longing
for Transcendence can be. The Pi of the title, the Irrational Number that all
of us know, is touched upon only lightly, it had once been of great interest to
Character Sol, but Max is chasing something slightly different. Still, Pi is film’s
the central Metaphor, as it represents the limits of Reductive Logic underlying
almost all Mathematics and other Sciences, a fundamental Mathematical Constant
representing something that sounds easy, the ratio of a circle's circumference
to its diameter, but can’t be nailed down neatly, the decimal points keep stringing
out endlessly; as of May 2025 (so long after this film was released), it’s at a
record-breaking 300 trillion decimal places that still hasn’t ended or started
to repeat.
Max’s
obsession is about a simpler number, only 216 digits long, that he believes is
equivalent to the Unified Field Theory that was so elusive to Albert Einstein
towards the end of his career. The more Max contemplates the number, the more
he scribbles down arcane calculations, the more he suffers from Migraines and Hallucinations,
and the more he is stalked by Sinister Forces. True, he’s an Unreliable
Narrator, constantly popping apparently prescription pills to control his Migraines,
so maybe these Sinister Forces are an extension of his Hallucinations, but the
film also grounds its Reality carefully, and Max is playing games with people
equally as Obsessed as he, so, likely, Thuggish Wall Street Guys (led by Marcy
Dawson (Pamela Hart)) & Thuggish Hassidic Jews (a casual encounter with a
Torah Scholar named Lenny (Ben Shenkman) bring them into the story), are real.
You see, Max’s research might allow him to predict Stock Market Fluctuations. It
also might lead to the Mystical True name of God hinted of in the Torah, whose
invocation will bring about the Messianic Age. And, not for nothing, 216 is 6x6x6,
or 666, the Number of the Beast in the Christian Tradition. It is one of the
great films concerning (well, also one of the only films concerning) Arithmomania,
a Mental Condition associated with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, and
characterized by an abnormal fixation to count objects, perform mental
calculations, and obsess over specific numbers.
It was Directed
by Arron Aronofsky who co-Wrote it with Eric Watson and Sean Gullette. Gullette
who also stars as Max; Gullette and is so good as the self-isolating, troubled
Genius, one can almost feel Max’s Migraines. His apartment is as cluttered as
his thoughts. His intensity of focus is in his eyes, his chaos is in his
gestures.
It is filmed
in unusually high-contrast B&W utilizing a Reversal Film Stock usually
associated with still Photography, but extremely rare in feature-length films.
Aronofsky again, "We didn’t want it to end up looking like ‘Clerks’ [1994] and
be all gray. We wanted it to be black or white. We were inspired by “Sin
City” by Frank Miller [he’s referring to the comic book, first issued in 1991,
not the film version of 2005]” Aronofshy’s Cinematographer was Matthew
Libatique, “Matty was brave enough to take on Reversal film, which many of us
shot in film school, and its black and white Reversal, extremely hard film
stock to expose.” It made the World, both Real and Imagined, starkly Abstract. (Libatique
would work with Aronofsky repeatedly in the future.)
There’s use
of the Snorri Cam (a camera strapped to the Actor's body, named after its
designers, the Snorri Brothers) accentuating the subjectivity, underlining Max
being an Unreliable Narrator, but also grounding his mania in recognizable
experience because of really excellent, Guerilla-Style, location footage of lower-Manhattan
and a little bit of Brooklyn (scenes on the NYC subway were filmed illegally). Aronosky,
“The idea behind Pi was to make a fully subjective movie …We
can shoot the other actors [meaning not Sean Gullette] almost POV, almost
straight-on, but Sean was almost always shot in profile so he was more of an
objective, and the audience was seeing his point of view more subjectively ...
Because we were trying to be subjective, every little gimmick we did, we tried to
have a reason for."
This is
combined with over-lapping imagery of the Symbols that Max is trying to turn
into Coherent Codes, and disturbing things that are wholly of Nightmares, like the
repeated appearance of Ants, especially of them crawling across exposed Brain Tissue.
The latter Surreal Nightmares fits into the former elements like a key-into-lock
because if the rapid cutting and montage techniques (Editor Oren Sarch, who
would also work with Aronofsky again) creating a flow between the Mundane and
the Profane, Max’s actual Life and his growing Madness.
Also of note
is the score, mostly electronic, aggressive and danceable, cold early on, later
often warmer and Romantic, always brooding, then exploding with pulsations as Max’s
Migraines hit (Composer Clint Mansell, formerly of the band Pop Will Eat Itself
and, in the future, another frequent Aronofsky Collaborator).
An
interesting thing came up in an interview with Writer/Director Aronofsky, which
addressed Composer Mansell even though Aronofshy was actually talking about
Editor Sarch. Reading it, I feel Aronofsky surrendered some control to Mansell,
as Aronofsky may have different music playing in his head as he put the project
together, suggesting a profound trust between the two. "That comes from my
hip-hop upbringing. I've always wanted to introduce hip-hop filmmaking to film.
So, I've been thinking about ways of doing that for a long time. There's
hip-hop art--graffiti, there's hip hop dance--breakdancing, there's hip-hop
music--rap, but there really isn't hip-hop film. So, for a long time, I was
trying to do that--to introduce some ideas. I think it's partly an attitude. I
think this film is sort of hip-hop in the fact that we were shooting in subways
late at night for 10 of our 28 days. Also, I think it's a way of cutting,
musically and stuff. I'm sure it's thematic also. I needs to be
anti-establishment. It's a hip-hop cyberpunk film." But Mansell isn’t Hip-Hop,
he much learns towards the Techno and Trance with strong Classical Influences.
The film “Pi”
has been most compared to is Director David Lynch "Eraserhead" (1977), also a Surreal,
B&W, debut features, but while Lynch’s intent was to demonstrate a Disorder
surrounding us that we deny exists, Aronofsky’s movie is about the vain struggle
to impose Order on the Chaos. Critic Jesse Fox Mayshark stated it this way, “‘Pi'
achieves some of the organic weirdness of Eraserhead, although Aronofsky isn’t
nearly as bold as David Lynch (Lynch never felt the need to explain anything) …
It’s like a music video for eggheads, and it’s a pleasant surprise—too often,
studios seem to assume that smart people don’t like fun movies, and people who
like fun movies aren’t smart. It’s nice to see someone thinks there’s a market
for a film that is both.”
In “Pi,” for
all its spinning and clicking and cutting, the narrative is still as linear as one
of Max’s drawings of spirals. The spirals are everywhere, not only Max’s
drawings, but cream in coffee, cigarette smoke, the tidepools of the East River.
Pythagoras’ and Leonardo Da Vinci’s Golden Ratio, also known as the “Fibonacci
Sequence,” named after yet another Great Mathematician, is something the film
obsesses about. Aronofsky stated, “Some of the structural things we did
relate back to the spirals and also the Fibonacci sequence. For instance, we
even shot the film in a ratio called 1.68 which is rarely ever shot. It’s shot
sometimes in Europe, but it’s never really shot in America, and the reason we
shot that is because that’s the Golden Ratio.”
In another
interview:
“It was just some cockamamie idea I had. I mean, you look at
DNA, and you look at the Milky Way. That's kind of weird that they have similar
form, similar shape. We're built from it, while living in a giant spiral. What
does that mean? Maybe there are a lot of spirals that we're not quite seeing.
We can see the big one. We can see the small one. What's in between? That was
[one] of the ideas. The more I started to do research, I started to see that
there's a lot of books, a lot of people are really into this idea of repeating
patterns on all different levels. You start to see spirals in nautilus shells,
ram's horns, in the way a plant grows--they grow in spirals, in our bones we
have spirals. There's so many of them. Our fingertips, if you look really closely
there's spirals. They're everywhere. It's a little creepy.
"It's strange when you start with all these different
ideas, and they seem totally foreign and different, and then you start to push
them together, and slowly but surely, they start to fit together in a way that
you never expected. It's almost like Max, the way he sees patterns everywhere.
You're always looking for a unifying pattern for all these different themes in
your movie, and as you start to work on them more and more, they to come
together."
The pity for
Character Max is that he draws the spirals moving outward, reaching up for
something, but the story is moving in the other direction, they are his Descent
into Maelström. As Critic MaryAnn Johanson put it, “‘Pi’ straddles
the line between brilliance and pretension to the point that it’s hard to know
on which side of that line it eventually rests.”
Most of the people in Max’s world are terrible, but that is largely his own
fault. Having become so insular, leaving his apartment so rarely, unable to
deal with people who offer nothing except decency (Devi (Samia Shoaib) is sweet
on him, and he her, but he’s also terrified of her), leaving only the Thugs and
Exploiters who are able to sniff him out. Sol, his Mentor, sees what is
happening to his best Student, and tries to warn him, as Sol had suffered the
same himself, but Max is beyond listening to good advice.
Sol: “Have
you met my new fish my niece bought me? I named her Icarus after you, my
renegade pupil. You fly too high; you’ll get burnt too.”
And this
film, so rich in detail, doesn’t miss the opportunity to include an image sunlight
through the wings of a gliding toy bird.
Max’s narration/confessions
tie his Migraine condition to a Childhood Memory, “When I was a little kid my
mother told me not to stare into the sun. So once when I was six, I did. At
first the brightness was overwhelming, but I had seen that before. I kept
looking, forcing myself not to blink, and then the brightness began to dissolve.
My pupils shrunk to pinholes, and everything came into focus, and for a moment…
I understood.”
Max is
committed to Three Principles that he has built is life around:
1) math being the language of nature.
2) all things can be understood through numbers.
3) there are patterns in nature.
Sol doesn’t
disagree, but after suffering a stroke, he humbly admitted to himself that
these real Principals are beyond the limits of Human Understanding and embraced
a richer life focused on family instead. Sol could be Max’s redeemer, but Max
is not ready yet, Max is far more like the Thuggish Hasidics who threaten him.
Writer/Director
Aronofsky borrowed all the Mathematical Equations from a textbook, and the Jewish
Numerology is grounded in centuries of Kabbalah research (the 216-digit name of
God is called the “Shem ha-Mephorash,” though 12- and 42-digit names seem more
popular in those Mystical Circles). Character Max has built a Supercomputer
named “Euclid” in his tenement apartment, which is dubious because of the energy
demands that ut=ltra-fast processing would demand, and anyway, how could he afford
the Processor he doesn’t have the power to run? But that also plays into the
Real-World foundations of the film’s Fantasies.
There’s
something called “Moore’s Law” which is named after Gordon Moore who, in 1965, predictively
claimed that Transistors and Microchips Computing Power Doubles approximately
every two-years, leading to Exponential Increases in Computational Power and Performance,
with minimal cost increased. What Moore failed to anticipate was the Heat-Energy
created by this Exponential Increase, and in more recent years, the Heat and Energy
draws demanded by Increased Performance has created a Crisis in the Industry, as
there are now unexpected Infrastructure and Environmental problems emerging in
the actual work of the Utopian Dream of an AI-driven Economy. Maybe it can’t deliver
on the promises because of its own weight, much like Howard Hughes “Spruce
Goose” airplane in 1947, or the Dot-com crash that came soon after this film’s
release.
During one
of Max’s more severe Migraine attacks, Euclid also has a kind of Mental
Breakdown, it flashes Abstract Patterns on its monitor, then Hebrew letters,
and then dies.
“Pi” cost a mere
$60,000 to make, financed largely by $100 contributions from friends and family.
(Note, most films published Production Cost include Post-Production, basically everything
before Marketing; in this case, oddly, Post-Production cost were left out of
most articles; the real total was more like $128,000, still insanely cheap). All
involved, even Actor Margolis, already an industry veteran of prominence, earned
an identical, minimal salaries (there’s actually Union Rules regarding this, the
SAG Limited Exhibition Agreement which Actors are paid $75 a day for films that
can only be shown in limited Art Venues) plus a share of the film (the same
rules mean the Actors get more money latter if the film suddenly gets a
surprising distribution deal). It eventually grossed over $3 million
domestically, a tiny amount and demonstrating why the film is somewhat obscure,
but it still drew much industry attention to all involved and represented a remarkable
Return-on-Investment. Keeping to the “Return-on-Investment” measure, it was a
bigger success that the same year’s big-budgeted SF films striving for maturity:
“Dark City,” “Siege,” and “Sphere.”
Since this
film, Aronofsky went on to be the most radical and acclaimed of USA Filmmakers,
getting hailed even when a specific project bombed, because no two films were
alike. He switched to a harrowing Realistic exploration of Addiction with “Requiem
for a Dream” (2000). After that, he dropped some of his stylistic
elements, extreme angles and aggressively fast editing, with the contemplative
SF film, “The Fountain” (2006). “The Wrestler” (2008), was
a pretty straight-forward Drama that received Oscar attention. He returned to
Surrealistic Psychodrama with “Black Swan” (2010) which won an Oscar. “Noah” (2014)
was a grand, FX-heavy, Biblical Epic that defied Biblical Literalism. “Mother”
(2017) was a notoriously perverse Horror film. “The Whale” (2022) was a Drama
set in a single room about a self-destructive man longing to Redeem himself
after tossing his life away and earned two Oscars.
Let me leave
you with a quote regarding this film by Critic Christopher Runyon, “When you
give up all that’s left of yourself to find the answers, you have to be
prepared to never be able to go back.”
Trailer:
Comments
Post a Comment